Regulatory frameworks

Definition

The extent to which regulation, openness to investment, and competition frameworks support infrastructure delivery.

What Does Good Look Like?

Stable, consistent, predictable and transparent regulatory agencies and decision making processes & low barriers to investment enhance competition and drive down costs and increase quality of infrastructure.

Best Practice Guidance:

The Role of Economic Regulators in the Governance of Infrastructure (OECD)
OECD Guidelines on Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises

Top Performers

Rank Country
Score /100
1 - United Kingdom
81.2
81.2/100
80.4
2 - Germany
80.4
80.4/100
3 3 United States
79.8
79.8/100
79.6
4 1 Netherlands
79.6
79.6/100
78.0
5 2 Finland
78.0
78.0/100

Guidance

Metric

Best Performer

Source

Best Practice

Regulatory (including competition) quality

Captures perceptions of the ability of the government to formulate and implement sound policies and regulations that permit and promote private sector development.

Infrastructure assets tend to form natural monopolies. Effective competition and infrastructure regulation is important to balance service levels with appropriate price controls that allow sufficient cost recovery to attract investment, and ultimately deliver quality infrastructure for consumers. Poor regulatory quality will deter investment.

30.2%

Strength of insolvency framework

The strength of insolvency framework index is based on four domains, including commencement of proceedings, management of debtor's assets, reorganisation proceedings and creditor participation.

The strength of the legal and corporate frameworks for liquidation and restructuring. It provides an indication of the ease of conducting business in a country. Improving your insolvency frameworks will encourage investment from those who require insolvency protections, including through infrastructure Special Purpose Vehicles, and for those dealing with local entities that may default. The strength of the legal and corporate frameworks for liquidation and restructuring. It provides an indication of the ease of conducting business in a country. Improving your insolvency frameworks will encourage investment from those who require insolvency protections, including through infrastructure Special Purpose Vehicles, and for those dealing with local entities that may default.

19.1%

Prevalence of foreign ownership

Score based on responses to the World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey question 'In your country, how prevalent is foreign ownership of companies'? This score has been normalised (rescaled to lie between 0 and 100) to ensure all data are expressed using the same scale.

Foreign investment policies can either promote or inhibit foreign investment in infrastructure assets. Policies that promote foreign investment will increase the supply of capital, promote competition and, in theory, reduce the costs of financing and delivering infrastructure, as well as encouraging innovation and exchange of skills.

17.9%

Product market regulatory score, network sectors

A survey-generated score for a country's regulatory management practices across the following domains: independence, scope of action, and accountability.

Regulatory policies can either promote or inhibit investment and competition in the network sector (all utilities including road, rail, ports, airports, electricity, gas, water and telecommunications). This can include price controls, licensing, and governance of SOEs. It shows the regulatory barriers for participants to enter and operate in the sector. The easier it is to enter the sector, the more likely to attract competition and investment that drives quality infrastructure.

15.8%

Effect of taxation on incentives to invest

Score based on responses to the World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey question 'In your country, to what extent do taxes reduce the incentive to invest? The index component is scored from 1-7 (with 1 = to a great extent; 7 = not at all).

Determines the extent to which tax incentives encourage or discourage investment and affect the competitiveness of the market. While this metric is not specific to infrastructure sectors, it shows general effect of taxation on investment, which includes infrastructure and has flow-through from the broader economy to infrastructure assets.

9%

Best performer

Best practice

Regulatory (including competition) quality

Strength of insolvency framework

Prevalence of foreign ownership

Product market regulatory score, network sectors

Effect of taxation on incentives to invest

Full Ranking

Rank Country
Score /100
1 - United Kingdom
81.2
80.4
2 - Germany
80.4
3 3 United States
79.8
79.6
4 1 Netherlands
79.6
78.0
5 2 Finland
78.0
6 2 Czech Republic
77.9
77.9
7 3 Singapore
77.9
75.8
8 3 Denmark
75.8
75.7
9 3 Australia
75.7
75.3
10 - Sweden
75.3
75.2
11 6 Ireland
75.2
74.5
12 3 Canada
74.5
13 - Japan
74.3
13 - Japan
74.3
14 1 Chile
72.6
14 1 Chile
72.6
15 1 Slovak Republic
72.3
72.2
16 2 New Zealand
72.2
72.0
17 - Belgium
72.0
18 4 United Arab Emirates
71.8
71.3
19 1 Portugal
71.3
70.5
20 1 Austria
70.5
21 - Spain
70.4
21 - Spain
70.4
69.6
22 4 Poland
69.6
68.3
23 - France
68.3
24 - Republic of Korea
66.5
25 1 Italy
64.5
25 1 Italy
64.5
63.9
26 1 Romania
63.9
63.8
27 3 Thailand
63.8
63.6
28 27 Azerbaijan
63.6
29 12 China
63.1
29 12 China
63.1
63.0
30 1 Malaysia
63.0
62.9
31 2 Mexico
62.9
32 5 The Philippines
62.8
62.8
33 1 Croatia
62.8
62.4
34 9 Rwanda
62.4
61.2
35 7 Slovenia
61.2
36 3 Peru
61.2
36 3 Peru
61.2
61.2
37 5 Uruguay
61.2
38 10 Morocco
60.8
38 10 Morocco
60.8
60.7
39 4 Colombia
60.7
40 12 Qatar
60.4
40 12 Qatar
60.4
60.2
41 5 Greece
60.2
60.0
42 2 Indonesia
60.0
43 11 Kenya
59.8
43 11 Kenya
59.8
59.4
44 7 Cambodia
59.4
59.1
45 7 Kazakhstan
59.1
59.1
46 7 South Africa
59.1
58.4
47 3 Paraguay
58.4
56.5
48 2 Turkey
56.5
55.6
49 4 Brazil
55.6
50 7 India
55.3
50 7 India
55.3
54.9
51 1 Jordan
54.9
54.2
52 5 Russia
54.2
53.5
53 4 Vietnam
53.5
53.5
54 7 Pakistan
53.5
52.9
55 2 Cote d'Ivoire
52.9
52.8
56 6 Senegal
52.8
57 11 Guinea
52.6
57 11 Guinea
52.6
52.5
58 7 Tunisia
52.5
50.3
59 3 Guatemala
50.3
50.3
60 - Argentina
50.3
61 6 Egypt
49.9
61 6 Egypt
49.9
49.4
62 3 Burkina Faso
49.4
63 1 Ghana
49.1
63 1 Ghana
49.1
64 1 Togo
48.8
64 1 Togo
48.8
65 - Benin
47.9
65 - Benin
47.9
47.6
66 8 Tanzania
47.6
67 5 Mali
47.3
67 5 Mali
47.3
45.0
68 1 Nigeria
45.0
44.9
69 3 Saudi Arabia
44.9
44.4
70 - Bangladesh
44.4
42.4
71 - Myanmar
42.4
72 - Chad
41.3
72 - Chad
41.3
73 - Niger
40.9
73 - Niger
40.9
40.4
74 - Ethiopia
40.4
32.7
75 - Ecuador
32.7
32.3
76 - Angola
32.3