This section shows a country’s rank, ranking change and score for each of the eight drivers. It also categorises each country’s driver performance on a scale from “Emerging” (score from 0-20) to “Global Leader” (score from 80-100).
At 10%, Tanzania has the third highest value of infrastructure investment as a share of GDP of all InfraCompass 2020 countries, behind only Ethiopia and Angola. It is unclear if the COVID-19 pandemic will impact these efforts.
Among the Low Income Countries, Tanzania has the highest value of closed infrastructure deals with foreign equity sponsorship at 0.38% of GDP. A high value may reflect favourable trade conditions and lower barriers to foreign investment. However, the COVID-19 pandemic may impact international capital flows.
Tanzania ranks among the most financially stable Low Income Countries in InfraCompass 2020. The stability of the financial system facilitates the smooth flow of funds between parties, improving the supply of capital for projects. The COVID-19 pandemic may impact this.
This is defined by the metrics with the highest unweighted score out of 100.
Tanzania does not currently publish an infrastructure pipeline of projects. The addition of an infrastructure pipeline could help provide infrastructure participants with a clear indication of prospective and confirmed infrastructure activity.
Tanzania does not have a national or sub-national infrastructure plan. The addition of an infrastructure plan could highlight infrastructure challenges and opportunities for investment, as well as detail the government's planned responses.
According to the World Bank, there is no formal requirement for a market sounding process in the Tanzania. Adding one could allow the government to determine if there is an interest from investors and lenders to provide commercial financing for projects.
This is defined by the metrics with the lowest weighted score out of 100, such that these metrics would have the greatest impact on the overall score.
For metrics that have binary outcomes (yes=100/no=0), no comparative income group average is reported.
This section shows country data for each of the 41 metrics. The figures in brackets denote the change in score since InfraCompass 2017.
Note that all data has been normalised on a scale of 1-100. For raw metric data, please download the complete InfraCompass 2020 dataset.
Where relevant, some metric scores have been inverted, such that all metrics have positive relationships with good infrastructure outcomes. For example, since lower compliance costs make it easier to invest in infrastructure, the normalised value of ‘number of procedures to start a business’ has been reversed such that lower number of procedures are scored closer to 100, and higher numbers closer to 0. In other words, a score of 0 indicates a poor performance, rather than 0 number of procedures.
28.2%
The recovery rate is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors through reorganisation, liquidation or debt enforcement (foreclosure or receivership) proceedings.
20.7%
World Governance Composite Indicator reflecting perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. The rule of law reflects whether the law imposes limits of power on the state, private sector and individuals.
18.1%
Whether the country conducts post-completion reviews on infrastructure projects to ensure the forecast outcomes are being achieved.
15.1%
Measures the governance practices that protect shareholders through three dimensions: the extent of shareholder rights index (shareholders’ rights and role in major corporate decisions), the extent of ownership and control index (governance safeguards protecting shareholders from undue board control and entrenchment), and the extent of corporate transparency index (corporate transparency on ownership stakes).
12.8%
Political stability and absence of violence score
Measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism. Estimate gives the country's score on the aggregate indicator, in units of a standard normal distribution i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5.
5%
Whether an infrastructure agency exists to coordinate an integrated approach to infrastructure delivery and policy.
The recovery rate is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors through reorganisation, liquidation or debt enforcement (foreclosure or receivership) proceedings.
28.2%
World Governance Composite Indicator reflecting perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. The rule of law reflects whether the law imposes limits of power on the state, private sector and individuals.
20.7%
Whether the country conducts post-completion reviews on infrastructure projects to ensure the forecast outcomes are being achieved.
18.1%
Measures the governance practices that protect shareholders through three dimensions: the extent of shareholder rights index (shareholders’ rights and role in major corporate decisions), the extent of ownership and control index (governance safeguards protecting shareholders from undue board control and entrenchment), and the extent of corporate transparency index (corporate transparency on ownership stakes).
15.1%
Measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism. Estimate gives the country's score on the aggregate indicator, in units of a standard normal distribution i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5.
12.8%
Whether an infrastructure agency exists to coordinate an integrated approach to infrastructure delivery and policy.
5%
1,177 USD
Population59.7 million persons
44.9 (0-100 best)
Infrastructure investment10.6% of GDP
Infrastructure gap5.6% of GDP
5.2%
GDP per capita growth rate6.3%
Gini coefficient37.8 (0-100 worst)
Gross Government Debt38.0% of GDP
Inflation rate3.6%
Summary credit rating0.0 (0-100 best)
Unemployment rate1.9%
Urbanisation ratio34.0% of total population
Road connectivity70.0 (0-100 best)
4.1 (1-7 best)
Efficiency of train services3.2 (1-7 best)
Efficiency of air transport services4.1 (1-7 best)
Efficiency of seaport services4.1 (1-7 best)
Electricity access32.8% of population
Electricity supply quality15.8% of output lost
Exposure to unsafe drinking water63.2% of population
Reliability of water supply3.6 (1-7 best)
Mobile-broadband subscriptions9.1 per 100 population
Fixed-broadband Internet subscriptions1.5 per 100 population