This section shows a country’s rank, ranking change and score for each of the eight drivers. It also categorises each country’s driver performance on a scale from “Emerging” (score from 0-20) to “Global Leader” (score from 80-100).
Burkina Faso has a financial stability score above the Low Income Countries’ average of 80, yet the implications of the COVID-19 pandemic may negatively impact this. The stability of the financial system facilitates the smooth flow of funds between parties, improving the supply of capital for projects.
Burkina Faso’s procurement processes are fair and transparent, resulting in the highest score of all African and Low Income Countries. Fair and transparent processes encourage more participation and competition, which help drive value for money and improve the quality of outcomes.
According to the World Bank, the time required to start a business in Burkina Faso is 13 days, resulting in a score higher than the Low Income Countries’ average of 18 days. Shorter times to set up businesses can persuade businesses to set up in a country, including new infrastructure entities.
This is defined by the metrics with the highest unweighted score out of 100.
Burkina Faso does not currently publish an infrastructure pipeline of projects. The addition of an infrastructure pipeline could help provide infrastructure participants with a clear indication of prospective and confirmed infrastructure activity.
Burkina Faso does not have a national or sub-national infrastructure plan. The addition of an infrastructure plan could highlight infrastructure challenges and opportunities for investment, as well as detail the government's planned responses.
According to the World Bank, there is an absence of market sounding process in Burkina Faso. Adding one could allow the government to determine if there is an interest from investors and lenders to provide commercial financing for projects.
This is defined by the metrics with the lowest weighted score out of 100, such that these metrics would have the greatest impact on the overall score.
For metrics that have binary outcomes (yes=100/no=0), no comparative income group average is reported.
This section shows country data for each of the 41 metrics. The figures in brackets denote the change in score since InfraCompass 2017.
Note that all data has been normalised on a scale of 1-100. For raw metric data, please download the complete InfraCompass 2020 dataset.
Where relevant, some metric scores have been inverted, such that all metrics have positive relationships with good infrastructure outcomes. For example, since lower compliance costs make it easier to invest in infrastructure, the normalised value of ‘number of procedures to start a business’ has been reversed such that lower number of procedures are scored closer to 100, and higher numbers closer to 0. In other words, a score of 0 indicates a poor performance, rather than 0 number of procedures.
28.2%
The recovery rate is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors through reorganisation, liquidation or debt enforcement (foreclosure or receivership) proceedings.
20.7%
World Governance Composite Indicator reflecting perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. The rule of law reflects whether the law imposes limits of power on the state, private sector and individuals.
18.1%
Whether the country conducts post-completion reviews on infrastructure projects to ensure the forecast outcomes are being achieved.
15.1%
Measures the governance practices that protect shareholders through three dimensions: the extent of shareholder rights index (shareholders’ rights and role in major corporate decisions), the extent of ownership and control index (governance safeguards protecting shareholders from undue board control and entrenchment), and the extent of corporate transparency index (corporate transparency on ownership stakes).
12.8%
Political stability and absence of violence score
Measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism. Estimate gives the country's score on the aggregate indicator, in units of a standard normal distribution i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5.
5%
Whether an infrastructure agency exists to coordinate an integrated approach to infrastructure delivery and policy.
The recovery rate is recorded as cents on the dollar recovered by secured creditors through reorganisation, liquidation or debt enforcement (foreclosure or receivership) proceedings.
28.2%
World Governance Composite Indicator reflecting perceptions of the extent to which agents have confidence in and abide by the rules of society, and in particular the quality of contract enforcement, property rights, the police, and the courts, as well as the likelihood of crime and violence. The rule of law reflects whether the law imposes limits of power on the state, private sector and individuals.
20.7%
Whether the country conducts post-completion reviews on infrastructure projects to ensure the forecast outcomes are being achieved.
18.1%
Measures the governance practices that protect shareholders through three dimensions: the extent of shareholder rights index (shareholders’ rights and role in major corporate decisions), the extent of ownership and control index (governance safeguards protecting shareholders from undue board control and entrenchment), and the extent of corporate transparency index (corporate transparency on ownership stakes).
15.1%
Measures perceptions of the likelihood of political instability and/or politically-motivated violence, including terrorism. Estimate gives the country's score on the aggregate indicator, in units of a standard normal distribution i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5.
12.8%
Whether an infrastructure agency exists to coordinate an integrated approach to infrastructure delivery and policy.
5%
887.3 USD
21.5 million persons
Infrastructure quality34.8 (0-100 best)
14.6 USD billion
GDP growth rate6.0%
GDP per capita growth rate0.3%
Gini coefficient35.3 (0-100 worst)
Gross Government Debt43.0% of GDP
Inflation rate1.1%
Summary credit rating25.0 (0-100 best)
Unemployment rate6.1%
Urbanisation ratio29.0% of total population
Road connectivity80.0 (0-100 best)
2.8 (1-7 best)
Efficiency of train services2.5 (1-7 best)
Efficiency of air transport services3.4 (1-7 best)
Efficiency of seaport services2.8 (1-7 best)
Electricity access17.7% of population
Exposure to unsafe drinking water81.8% of population
Reliability of water supply2.9 (1-7 best)
Digital Adoption Index0.2 (0-1 best)
Mobile-broadband subscriptions29.9 per 100 population
Fixed-broadband Internet subscriptions0.1 per 100 population